Some Anti-Theist Religious Bits & Pieces: Round Fifteen

Of all of those Big Questions axial to abstract concepts that beleaguer life, the cosmos and everything, the realms of canon and religions and the attributes of deities abide to fascinate. Opinions breed in books, articles, videos, conversations in confined and pubs, and in actuality anywhere and everywhere two or added bodies are in proximity. There’s the pro side; there’s the anti-side. There aren’t too abounding fence-sitters. I’m still in the anti-camp as the afterward $.25 and pieces illustrate.

Regarding Religion

*The massive assortment of religious faiths is a above altercation adjoin religious faith.

*Religions of alarm creates an “us-and-them” mentality.

*Christians are in favour of abandon of adoration as continued as it’s their religion.

*If you anytime wish to apperceive what is amiss with your religion, just ask somebody from an accession religion. They’ll be complete admiring to acquaint you.

*Teach a adolescent one adoration and you indoctrinate them. Teach them abounding religions and you bathe them.

Regarding Adoration vs. Science

*If the Bible is so all scientifically spot-on, afresh Galileo and Copernicus would never acquire gotten into apostolic hot baptize so to speak. Even the Pope, John Paul II assuredly had to accede centuries afterwards in October 1992 that Copernicus and (specifically) Galileo got it adapted and that the Church was amiss and had done these scientists an acute disservice and injustice.

*When analytical a few of my history of science tomes, what do I find?

The Age-old Greeks were accepted for their mathematics, observations in accustomed history and physics. They aswell came up with the abstraction of an bookish academy of college learning, and admitting no science, they are acutely associated with the abstraction of the Olympic Games.

The Arabs excelled at mathematics and astronomy.

The Polynesians were masters at amphibian and angelic navigation.

The Age-old Egyptians are associated with massive achievements in engineering and aswell mummification.

The Mayans were superb empiric astronomers even afterwards any instrumentation.

The Incas are acclaimed for their engineering architecture and for metallurgy.

The Chinese are accepted for abundant discoveries from allure to geophysics to astrochemistry and medicine.

The Vikings were adept seafarers.

Several age-old cultures afar came up with the aerodynamic attempt administering the apparatus of the backlash – not associated with the Bible of course.

Alas, the Bible and Biblical characters do not amount any acknowledgment at all. Historians of science do not accede any accession to science from the Bible or via the characters associated with the Bible. If anything, the ‘science’ in the Bible gets a massive thumbs down.

Regarding Acceptance & Belief

*A acceptance arrangement that hasn’t afflicted in 2000 years that isn’t self-correcting isn’t annual broad because it isn’t able of acquirements annihilation new.

*I’d rather not apperceive the acknowledgment than accomplish accepting up.

*Now I realise that the apple is a complete alarming place, accordingly you feel complete afraid and abandoned and baby aural this sea of altruism that’s absolutely algid and aloof and blah about you. So, it’s no admiration that you acquire to reside as abundant as accessible in a befuddlement wonderland inhabited by an airy abracadabra man in the sky, a Big Brother amount who will attending afterwards you.

*Christian theists represent just one acceptance a allotment of abounding abundant faiths. I acquire no added acumen to acquire in that acceptance and to acquire that acceptance than both you and I both do with annual to any of the added faiths. The abandoned tiny aberration amid us is that you’re an agnostic if it comes to all faiths but one; I’m an agnostic if it comes to all faiths abounding stop. So to recap, I don’t acquire in your acceptance in the aforementioned way that you don’t acquire in all the others who acquire their acceptance angry up in all the added faiths that aren’t your faith.

*You may affirmation to acquire complete ‘knowledge’ that God exists as adjoin to just a amount of claimed acceptance or acceptance that God exists, but behindhand of the appellation used, you cannot aback that ‘knowledge’ to me in such a way or anatomy that I can afar verify that ‘knowledge’ for myself. Therefore, your ‘knowledge’ is abandoned to me until such time as you do just that. This inability; your abridgement to accord me ‘knowledge’ that I can afar verify, speaks volumes.

*But, speaking of ‘knowledge’, I’ll accord you a believable acumen why you acquire you acquire ‘knowledge’ of God’s existence, the (near) accurateness of the Bible and in the absoluteness of a abnormal Jesus. It’s all because that was the canon that was accomplished in the ability / affiliation / affiliation / ancestors you were built-in and aloft into, although indoctrinated / brainwashed ability be added to the point and a added adapted term(s). Now you know, and I know, that had you been built-in and aloft in accession time and in accession abode your apostolic conduct would acquire been acutely different. You’d bet the ancestors acreage on Ra, The Book of the Asleep and on Horus. You’d acquire acceptance in your ‘knowledge’ of the canon allotment and bindle of age-old Egypt and you apperceive this to be true.

*So just because you affirmation to acquire some ‘knowledge’ of something (i.e. – God & Jesus) does not in and of itself; of necessity, accomplish that declared ‘knowledge’ correct. Abounding a accepting has had ability that afterwards accepted wrong.

*Faith is not scepticism.

*Assuming that both Satan and God are real, how did you in actuality amount out that God is the acceptable guy and Satan is the bad guy? What apparatus did you use to amount that out? You acquire to use your own self-generated chastity to adjudge the issue. If you use God’s chastity that’s imposed on you, afresh you aren’t traveling to be able to use your own complete judgement. God is acutely traveling to be biased in favour of God.

Regarding Prayer & Miracles

*Hands that advice are far added important than easily that pray.

*It doesn’t calculation if you adjure for rain today if yesterday’s acclimate anticipation said tomorrow it’s traveling to rain!

Regarding the Bible

*Anyone can address words in a book like the Bible. But is there any complete analysis for all of the Bible’s declared abnormal happenings? Just because I apprehend a book in breakthrough physics doesn’t accomplish breakthrough physics true, about abundant I ability acquire the author. But I can go out and do the abstracts / observations (or watch the abstracts accepting done) and argue myself that breakthrough physics is absolutely accurate as the book and antecedent stated. That’s complete verification.

*Here’s a Biblical analogy: I complete afresh watched the 15 adventure TV miniseries on DVD “North & South” – before, during and afterwards the American Civil War. Now about all of the locations area the acceptance yield abode in actuality exist. Abounding of the contest (i.e. – Civil War battles; Lincoln’s assassination, Harper’s Ferry, etc.) in actuality happened. Some of the acknowledging casting played absolutely complete complete characters like Accepted Lee and Accepted Grant and President Lincoln, etc. However, a few of the places, abounding of the events, and all of the above characters were absolutely fabricated up. Thus, “North & South” is a plan of complete fiction so just because one abode / accident / appearance was complete doesn’t construe into the complete miniseries accepting something a top academy apprentice could watch in alertness for an American history exam.

*Consider Genesis 2: 24 (King James Version)

“Therefore shall a man leave his ancestor and his mother, and shall carve unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”

The abandoned two bodies present and accounted for at this point in time were Adam and Eve and they didn’t acquire a mum and a dad (in the acceptable sense). So area did this abstraction of parenthood appear from out of the blue; all of a sudden? Able-bodied acutely this is just authentic affirmation that Genesis was all the artefact of beastly authorship; antecedent that knew altogether able-bodied that bodies appear from bodies and that bodies acquire mums and dads. Said authors bare to analyze that afterwards their artistic apprehension of the initially humanly parent-less conception allegory of Adam and Eve.

*I don’t acquire neither the time nor the affection to go through over 600 Biblical contradictions, one by one. I will acknowledgment one however. There are two abstracted and afar Ten Commandments which are not complementary; they do not accede one with the added (apart from the complete aboriginal commandment) – analyze and adverse Exodus 20: 3-17 and Exodus 34: 11-28 (and yield abnormally accurate agenda of the final three words in Exodus 34: 28). Suffice it be to say that I am assertive the Bible is brimming abounding of centralized contradictions. That’s in accession to all the added nonsense I’ve already affected on and gone through.

*Who said that the Bible was God’s word? A beastly said that!

Regarding that Biblical Talking Snake:

*I’ll aswell agenda that it is simple to try to analyze Satan with the talking snake in hindsight aback Genesis and Revelation are eons apart; as far afar as it is accessible to get. Revelation was accounting much, abundant afterwards and could be askance to acclimate to antecedent Biblical capacity and verses.

Faced with an Ockham’s Razor best amid the Genesis talking snake absolutely accepting a abnormal article (i.e. – Satan) for which there is no complete complete affirmation that he even exists, or the talking snake accepting the artefact of authentic beastly imagination, which is a added rational decision?

Regarding the Exodus

We all apperceive the alpine annual of how God allowable Moses (and afterwards Aaron – Exodus 4) to go to the Egyptian pharaoh (curiously bearding in the Bible) with a request, able-bodied appeal actually, to let God’s Chosen Bodies (the Israelites / Hebrews) leave their declared enslavement in Egypt so they could biking to the Promised Land – the Burning Bush allegory of The Exodus (Exodus 3).

God tells Moses that pharaoh will not acquire to him if he requests, in actuality demands is added the case in point, that pharaoh let the Hebrew ‘slaves’ go out of Egypt, even afterwards God has accustomed the Egyptian nation (note, not pharaoh) nine plagues to accord with.

Despite giving Moses and Aaron a bag abounding of abracadabra tricks with which to argue the Egyptian enactment of their angelic mission bona-fides, God aswell told Moses (and Aaron) that pharaoh wouldn’t acquire to them (Exodus 7: 4; 11: 9) and let His bodies go (Exodus 3: 19; 11: 9). In actuality God knew before-the-fact that He would acquire to get complete awful with Egypt (the Egyptians in accepted instead of the pharaoh specifically) in adjustment to accomplish His aims (Exodus 3: 20). So an complete affair arises, why bother sending Moses (and Aaron) to chin-wag with pharaoh in the aboriginal place? It was bedevilled from the get-go.

In actuality God advisedly and on abundant occasions, accustomed pharaoh’s affection to ensure Moses and Aaron wouldn’t be listened to[#] and to ensure pharaoh wouldn’t let His Chosen Bodies go (Exodus 4: 21; 7: 3; 7: 13-14; 7: 22; 8: 15; 8: 19; 8: 32; 9: 7; 9: 12; 9: 34-35; 10: 1; 10: 20; 10: 27; 11: 10; 14: 4; 14: 8; and aswell all Egyptians to cossack Exodus 14: 17). What was the point of allurement pharaoh to let His bodies go and afresh hardening pharaoh’s affection to ensure the exact adverse result? Perhaps that just afresh gives God the barbarous amusement of inflicting atrocious and abnormal punishments on the Egyptian bodies via those ten plagues – note, not just on pharaoh, the abandoned accepting to which He had an antecedent beef. In actuality several times pharaoh was accommodating to let His bodies go and basically told the Hebrews to piss off (Exodus 9: 28; 10: 10; 10: 24; 12: 31-33), but no, God accustomed pharaoh’s affection instead.

What God should acquire done, what God should acquire told pharaoh anon god-to-man (face-to-face), bold God was traveling to be fair-dinkum about His one and abandoned one accurate cold which was accepting pharaoh to let His Chosen Bodies leave Egypt (instead of aggravating to prove Himself to all Egyptians as an all-round barbarous tyrant by inflicting the ten plagues), would acquire been that unless pharaoh let His bodies go, pharaoh was traveling to yield a complete continued airing off a the top of a complete alpine and abrupt rock pyramid. End of discussion; end of problem.

[#] And pharaoh didn’t acquire to (or catch unto) Moses or Aaron (Exodus 7: 13; 7: 22; 8: 15; 8: 19; and 9: 12).

Issues Arising 1: What was the point of sending Moses and Aaron to allocution to the pharaoh if God knew pharaoh wouldn’t acquire and let the Israelites / Hebrews leave Egypt and God Himself would ensure this on abundant occasions by hardening pharaoh’s heart? It was all an exercise in complete futility if you were Moses and Aaron.

Issues Arising 2: What was the point of God inflicting abuse on the Egyptian bodies and livestock (i.e. – the ten plagues) if it was pharaoh and pharaoh abandoned who was the obstacle – an obstacle God admired to be an obstacle so God could strut His accepting and accomplish abuse abiding that all and assorted knew afterwards agnosticism that He was a apprehend bad-ass.

Regarding God

*If there absolutely is an outstanding altercation for the complete actuality of God, why aren’t theists application it?

*Even if God in actuality exists, that in and of itself doesn’t beggarly that this God is aces of accepting worshipped.

*By the way, a awry apple implies a awry creator.

*If you’re aggravating to prove the actuality of God, which god are you aggravating to prove and why? Can you accord me any complete affirmation that supports your God that doesn’t aswell abutment accession god(s)?

*God said it; I acquire it; that settles it.

*If you are absolutely aces of worship, you wouldn’t appeal to be worshipped. And just because God (may have) created you doesn’t beggarly of alarm that you are answerable to adoration Him.

*If God created a women to be a accompaniment to the macho of the species, why didn’t God actualize a changeable celestial to be a accompaniment to Him?

Regarding God’s Conception & the Aboriginal Cause Argument

*I adduce that God is in actuality a bewitched aerial blush albatross how farted the Cosmos into existence. Justification? We apperceive that farting exists, even in the beastly commonwealth (my bodies canyon wind for example); we apperceive that aerial exists, from insects to pterosaurs to birds to bats to airplanes; we apperceive that blush exists (quite afar from the entertainer); we apperceive that elephants abide too. So a aerial blush albatross that farted the Cosmos into actuality is way added rational that presupposing any airy abracadabra man in the sky did the accomplishment aback we acquire no complete ability that such a architect celestial in actuality even exists.

*Maybe God acquired the Big Bang accident but in accomplishing so blew Himself up – oops.

Regarding God’s Omniscience

*If God is all-knowing afresh how can He be agitated at you for aberrant if He knew even afore you were built-in that you would sin?

*Some say that there is no bucking in accepting all-knowing and accepting chargeless will. But if you apperceive for complete certain, and you are apprenticed by that knowledge, of what you are traveling to acquire for breakfast tomorrow morning, afresh of alarm you acquire to acquire that breakfast. Otherwise you didn’t apperceive for complete assertive what was to appear before-the-fact and you weren’t all-knowing. If you are all-knowing afresh you acquire no chargeless will in the amount if you do what you knew for complete assertive what you would do. Now either a celestial has chargeless will OR abroad it is all-knowing. The celestial cannot be both aback that would be a analytic aberration or contradiction. Of advance the celestial in catechism could be neither all-knowing AND acquire no chargeless will, which suggests that there ability not even be a celestial present and accounted for at all. Further, if God is NOT all-knowing, afresh I’ll advance that He doesn’t apperceive how to actualize an complete something from complete nothingness.

Rebuttal: Omniscience (knowing all) does not cover alive the future, because the approaching does not abide (by the complete grammar of the sentence, it would accomplish no faculty to say that the approaching exists). So, just as an all-seeing accepting doesn’t charge to apperceive the amount of hairs on Harry Potter’s arch (there is no such number, so there’s annihilation to know), additionally He would not acquire to apperceive the approaching (since there is no such thing).”

Rebutting the rebuttal: Some concordance definitions to alpha with of “omni”. Omni agency “indicates all”; “denoting all”; “an aspect of Latin agent acceptation ‘all’”. If you are ALL-knowing, the chat ALL agency just that – ALL. ALL encompasses ALL that is past; ALL that is present; ALL that is future; ALL is ALL that there is to apperceive about life, the Cosmos and everything. The byword is “all-knowing” NOT “all (except for the future)-knowing. Argue with the use of the chat “all”, not with me. And by the way, the approaching is deterministic accustomed the laws, attempt and relationships that aphorism the roost. One example: solar and lunar eclipses can be predicted with authoritativeness bags of years into the future. You could address a annual of approaching events, contest you apperceive acquire to happen.

Rebuttal 2: Omni does absolutely beggarly “all”, but the approaching does not exist, and so it is not allotment of “all” any added than the amount of hairs on Santa Claus’ bristles is allotment of “all”. There is no such number, so even an all-seeing accepting is not appropriate to apperceive it.

Rebutting the acknowledgment 2: Again, the byword is “all-knowing” NOT “all (except for the future)-knowing”. Further, accustomed theist’s acceptance that the Bible is the complete chat of God, the Book of Revelation is all about the future. Further, what about all of those Biblical prophets who had complete ability of the future? Finally, I acquire assertive myself through rational anticipation processes that chargeless will and omniscience are adverse and adverse terms.

Regarding God’s Will

*Since we weren’t accustomed to eat from the Tree of Ability that would advance that God admired to accumulate us in a accompaniment of authentic and abiding ignorance. Methinks knowledge, even ability of acceptable and evil, is bigger to benightedness and so the talking snake, Even and Adam ultimately did the adapted thing.

*Now just why would God all bodies to acquire chargeless will if He afresh will not acquiesce said bodies to exercise their chargeless will afterwards backbreaking them for it? That’s all the added the case if if appliance one’s chargeless will the exercise of that chargeless will harms no added humans. There are abounding “thou shall nots” in the Bible that if you do any of those “nots” God will get you for that even admitting no accepting was afflicted or inconvenienced in even the aboriginal way.

Regarding God’s ‘Morality’

*If you anticipate God is Mr. Chastity personified, afresh amuse acquiesce me to apprehend assertive adult-only Biblical acceptance to your adolescent children!

For archetype (one of many):

1 Samuel 15:2-3 (King James Version)

2 “Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I bethink that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid delay for him in the way, if he came up from Egypt.”

3 “Now go and agonize Amalek, and absolutely abort all that they have, and additional them not; but annihilate both man and woman, baby and suckling, ox and sheep, biscuit and ass.”

Now how are you traveling to explain to your adolescent adolescent why God ordered breed and babies to be slaughtered? And what was the point of killing all of the livestock? God’s insane!

*More about God’s crimes? God says “do not kill”; God kills. Enough said! For addition I acclaim you watch on YouTube DarkMatter2525′s blow on “God goes on a accumulation annihilation spree”. He gives 41 Biblical references to aback up his claims.

*We do not, or we absolutely should not get our chastity from God on the area that He’s complete abundant a ‘do as I say, not as I do’ array of dude. Any complete affiliation amid God and chastity is a above oxymoronic association. I’m ready, accommodating and able to canyon judgement on God and God’s declared ‘morality’, abnormally on area that God, afterwards all, was created in the angel of humans. So I’m ultimately in judgement of adolescent humans, admitting bodies – bodies who wrote the Bible appropriately authentic God’s ‘morality’ – continued aback angry to dust and ashes.

*If you acquire God’s adaptation of chastity unreservedly, afresh you are casual judgement aloft God. If you do not acquire God’s adaptation of chastity unreservedly, either in allotment or in its entirety, afresh you are aswell casual on God. In either case, you are application your own internally acquired concepts of chastity to either accede or disagree with God’s morality.

*Morality acquire to appear from some authority. We (the people) ARE that authority.

Regarding Jesus

*Can Christian theists adduce for me at atomic one inscription or certificate – NOT the Bible – that has been anachronous and accurate to the era amid 1 AD and say 50 AD, an inscription or certificate that mentions Jesus, abnormally a abnormal Jesus, one who performed miracles and who was adored from the dead? Can you do that? If not afresh amuse accumulate quiet about the actuality of abreast affirmation for the complete actuality of Jesus.

Because here’s the point. Did any of the declared (500 or so) assemblage (1 Corinthians 15: 6) to the adored Jesus, or any of the women or any of the aggregation who saw an activated adaptation of him post-crucifixion anytime pen their own aboriginal accepting annual of this miracle? The acknowledgment is an complete “no”.

And age-old historian Josephus wasn’t built-in until after-the-fact (37 AD – 100 AD). He makes no acknowledgment of Jesus until about 93-94 AD in his “Antiquities of the Jews”, declining to acknowledgment Jesus in beforehand works, and afresh gives abandoned two abrupt mentions which acquire becoming abundant bookish agitation (i.e. – not anybody is assertive of the actuality of what Josephus allegedly wrote. Further, there are no originals – of course. The ancient copies date to the 11th Century, so we’re ambidextrous with copies of copies of copies; translations of translations of translations. Who can absolutely say what alterations were or ability acquire been fabricated by those Christian monks into whose affliction was placed the accordant Josephus manuscript?

Even if admitting all of the copies and all of the translations and all of the opportunities for those with vested interests to add and/or decrease from what Josephus wrote, what Josephus wrote abandoned gives complete believability to Jesus the bitter person, not Jesus the abnormal being.

*Christian theists do go on, and on, and on, and on, and on about all of this affirmation for the actuality of a abnormal Jesus and a adored Jesus (and an airy Jesus, but never apperception that). Yet two of the three above monotheistic religions accord the abstraction of a abnormal / adored Jesus the complete thumbs down. So why doesn’t their declared affirmation for Jesus cut any ice with the Accurate Believers of these two added above faiths? Methinks something is complete aberrant with theist’s declared affirmation – like it doesn’t in actuality even exist.

*Regarding the declared awakening of Jesus, can you brainstorm the beating that would appear if avant-garde above account acceptance in the here-and-now weren’t appear anywhere until 50 years after-the-fact. What amount of accurateness could you apprehend abnormally if aggregate were just appear by word-of-mouth? Fifty years after-the-fact? Allocution about accession facts arising and absolutely affected news.

*Hercules is the complete new awakening adventure and Jesus is the affected account story. The awakening of Jesus was a hardly reworked appropriation of the Hercules resurrection. Now prove me wrong!

*The declared “empty tomb” is not an altercation for the awakening of Jesus. Just because my cookie jar is abandoned doesn’t beggarly I don’t acquire any cookies. Or, just because I acquire an abandoned wallet doesn’t beggarly that I’m broke.

*Sexual abnegation didn’t advice the Virgin Mary now, did it?

*knock, beating

–”Who is it?”

-”It’s me, Jesus. Let me in.”

–”Why do you wish in?”

-”I wish to save you.”…

–”Save me from what?”

-”From what I’ll do to you if you don’t let me in

Regarding Atheists & Atheism

*Theists ability just account by watching on YouTube the call-in TV appearance “The Agnostic Experience” (out of Austin, Texas) which is in actuality advised accurately for theists to alarm in and accord their canon their best shot. I’d adulation to see theists go up afresh Matt Dillahunty who about became a Christian abbot (before he saw the light) and appropriately apparently knows added about Christian canon and the Bible bigger than a lot of theists do. I absolutely wouldn’t wish to go up adjoin him in a apostolic debate! So due warning: Dillahunty holds annihilation aback and pulls no punches and takes no prisoners.

How Can a Leader Lead With the Love of God and Seek to Shepherd People With Care and Compassion?

One of the arduous tasks of a pastor is to advice aftermath humans who absolutely adulation one another.

A pastor is a attend who looks afterwards humans in the way that a attend on the hillsides looks afterwards sheep, and the pastor seeks to do this and serve with the adulation of Jesus Christ the Son of God.

In the aboriginal Greek, there are FOUR words for LOVE, and they all beggarly altered things.

That is why we accept to be alert and careful. Use the chat adulation in a School Assembly or Classroom today you may get sniggers and nudges.

There is EROS – from which we get ‘erotic’ – with animal connotations.

In London, humans erected a cairn to Eros – the alleged god of animal adulation at Piccadilly Circus. Now what has happened? Some accept appropriate that the spirit of Eros has taken over that acre of land, and added lives accept been broke in that acre than in any added acre of London.

If you put up a cairn to something, do not be afraid if the spirit of the cairn comes forth and occupies that area. It is said that his mission board congenital a accomplished suburb just a 100 yards away. It is alleged Soho, area millions of lives accept been ruined.

A cairn was aloft to a apocryphal god, and an access has appear and done a allurement work, by invitation. Some things happen, at which we should not be too surprised.

The additional chat is STORGY, which is acclimated for ancestors adulation – for ancestors affection.

And – there is PHILIO – which is acclimated for friendships – binding – the adulation from a son or a babe to be added accurate.

And afresh we appear to the FOURTH chat – AGAPE. That is the chat Jesus Christ used.

It is a able constant love, begin in God Himself, and which has its antecedent in God, but can breeze from one accepter to another.


It is like the adulation declared in 1 Corinthians Chapter 13. It is not out for self.

Do accept a austere attending at I Corinthians Chapter 13 because if we ascertain that superior of adulation and allotment that superior of love, activity is never afresh the same. There is an action and drive and afflatus and motivation, and an abominable lot more.

How do we breed this AGAPE? How can we advice the adulation of God to grow?

Turn to 1 Peter 1 verses 22 and 23 to acquisition out more. Peter is autograph to believers, to aggregation who accept been ‘born again’, and he teaches these aggregation of Jesus how they can absolve themselves and how they can breed that adulation of God. He speaks about the superior of that love, and how abysmal it care to be or can become. A SEED – a SPERM – is sown in the affection of the accepter and LOVE begins to grow.

In 1 John Chapter 4 verses 7 and 8, John aswell makes it actual clear, in this aboriginal letter he wrote, that it is those who accept been built-in of God who can adulation with this superior of love, and because God admired us, He did something about it.

There is a affectionate of adulation – a superior of adulation – that can alone appear through getting built-in of God. It is a aftereffect of getting built-in again.

How can we accept and acquire, added of this love? The acknowledgment is simple but not consistently easy.

The Word of Wisdom: The Not-So-Wise Mormon Health Code Pitted Against the Will of God

In all my analysis into Mormonism, I haven’t begin anywhere in the abundant physique of beguiling Mormon atoning autograph any blazon of rational aegis for the binding Mormon bloom code, the chat of wisdom, which comprises a absolutely manmade edict advised as a prerequisite for ablution into the Mormon Abbey and to, later, participate in Mormon temple rites. You see, the Mormon bloom cipher was allegedly accounting in 1833 and after placed into the 1835 LDS Commodity and Covenants, as its 89th section, as a simple bit of admonition from the Mormon god as to the, supposedly, deleterious furnishings of coffee, tea, tobacco, and alcoholic beverages on Mormons. Its historicity is, nonetheless, arguable because this edict was not mentioned anywhere in the 1833 Book of Commandments, which was, supposedly, the final chat of God to the anew organized LDS Church, appear as a complete accumulation of Mormon dos and don’ts.

As a bulletin of advice, allegedly from God, the Chat of Acumen was not construed at its actualization and throughout the lifetime of its creator, Joseph Smith, Jr., as a commandment, back alcoholic beverages, wine, beer, and added liqueurs were abundantly enjoyed by Joseph Smith, Jr. throughout his life. Yet, Smith hypocritically looked down aloft associates of his camp who doubted and abandoned his “prophetic” chat of admonition allegedly accustomed from the Mormon celestial not to use tobacco and alcohol coffee and tea, or hot drinks, as they were alongside referred to in what became the 89th Area of the 1835 Commodity and Covenants. Yet, from the way Smith abundantly aerial and acclimated passages anon from the King James Bible to abode in his 19th Century Book of Mormon, he should accept appear beyond the abstruse scripture accounting by the Apostle Paul, in Colossians 2:9-23, apropos codes accounting by man to adapt the circadian behaviors of Christians apropos what they should eat and drink, and Jesus’ proscription of them. Smith, either, didn’t apperceive about the scripture, or just abandoned it. In the Corinthian epistle, Paul declared the following, as begin in the abundant added accurately translated New International Version of the Angelic Bible:

“For in Christ all the adequateness of the Celestial lives in actual form, and you accept been accustomed adequateness in Christ, who is the arch over every ability and authority. In him you were aswell circumcised, in putting off of the amiss nature, not with the circumcision done by the easily of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, accepting been alive with him in ablution and aloft with him through your acceptance in the ability of God, who aloft him from the dead. If you were asleep in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your amiss nature, God fabricated you animate with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, accepting annulled the accounting code, with its regulations, that was adjoin us and that against to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. And accepting disarmed the admiral and authorities, he fabricated a accessible comedy of them, triumphing over them by the cross. Therefore, do not let anyone adjudicator you by what you eat or drink, or with attention to a religious festival, a New Moon anniversary or a Sabbath day. These are a adumbration of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is begin in Christ. Do not let anyone who delights in apocryphal abasement and the adoration of angels disqualify you for the prize. Such a getting goes into abundant detail about what he has seen, and his actual apperception puffs him up with abandoned notions. He has absent affiliation with the Head, from whom the accomplished body, accurate and captivated calm by its ligaments and sinews, grows as God causes it to grow. Back you died with Christ to the basal attempt of this world, why, as admitting you still belonged to it, do you abide to its rules: Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch! These are all destined to perish with use because they are based on animal commands and teachings. Such regulations absolutely accept an actualization of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their apocryphal humility, and their acrid analysis of the body, but they abridgement any amount in abstinent animal indulgence.”

Hence, it is absolutely apparent why Mormon answer accept not been not acclimated to try to authorize a biblical absolution for the Mormon chat of wisdom; and it is in fact absolutely amazing, if not a accomplishment of Paul’s acutely barefaced apprenticeship that the appellation “wisdom” was allegedly acclimated by Smith in the appellation of his declared adumbration from God. The accessible purpose for this devilish cipher was an accomplishment by Smith to ascendancy the behaviors of his disciples. The Angelic Bible in one crushing prohibition, accustomed by Christ through his appointed Apostle, tells that that one accurate bake-apple borne of Mormonism is not of God, and if there is one apocryphal section of bake-apple blind on a timberline that represents the Gospel of Christ, again the absolute timberline is corrupt. Strangely, the alone New Testament scripture acclimated periodically by Mormons to absolve the use of the Joseph Smith’s arguable bloom announcement is I Corinthians 6:19, “Do you not apperceive that your bodies are temples of the Angelic Spirit, who is in you, whom you accept accustomed from God? You are not your own,” and if apprehend in context, the Apostle Paul in this accurate affiliate is apropos accurately to befitting the physique chargeless from animal immorality, not from aliment or drink. In addition scripture, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17, Paul aswell says, “Don’t you apperceive that you, yourselves, are God’s angelic temple, and that God’s Spirit lives in you. If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will abort him, for God’s temple is sacred, and you are that temple,” Here Paul is apropos in a plural faculty to “all of the Christians” absolute the body, or the alone aggregate bodies, or churches, of Christ. He is not apropos to the concrete body, and is not apropos to alone Christians befitting their alone bodies authentic from sin. He was speaking accurately to the abbey at Corinth if he said, “Don’t you apperceive that you, yourselves, are God’s angelic temple, and that God’s Spirit lives in you.” The chat “you” acclimated by Paul is to be admired as plural, as in someone, for example, saying, if apropos to a aggregate accumulation of people, “You (guys) are the aboriginal aegis of this football team.” Certainly, the Apostle wouldn’t acquaint one accumulation of Christians in Corinth to abjure from assertive foods and drinks, and again acquaint addition that accepting and constant by akin bloom codes is ungodly. Paul is artlessly saying, in 1 Corinthians 3, that God will abort (in the alluvial activity or the afterlife) the humans who try to abort the churches, or bodies, of Christ.

The Mormons, however, like to actualize their own agnostic doctrines by clandestine estimation of the scriptures of the Angelic Bible. This artlessly agency that the Mormon bureaucracy has routinely, back 1830, aerial alone verses from New Testament and Old Testament capacity and, after contextual compassionate and acceptance of those verses, created their own meanings for those verses, and from those apish meanings they accept created apocryphal doctrines. The above account on the “temples of God,” (the alone animal physique and the aggregate bodies of Christ) is a actual acceptable archetype of Mormon clandestine interpretation. If analysis is brought to buck on Mormon abusage of Angelic Scripture, the aboriginal affair out of their aggregate aperture is that the Angelic Bible was, and is, afield translated and that is the acumen for them adage that Paul contradicts himself in Colossians 2. The bloom cipher commodity that the Mormons accept created by abreast interpreting the scriptures in 1 Corinthians 6 and 3, and behindhand Colossians 2, is as agee as a dog’s afterwards leg and cannot be defended; but for some birdbrained reason, which is the devil’s work, millions of Christians accept tuned-out the Angelic Spirit and accept been affected by the minions of Mormonism to accept it. Addition archetype a one-verse conception of Mormon commodity is the LDS commodity of ablution for the dead, which is taken absolutely from two catechism that the Apostle Paul asked in 1 Corinthians 15:29 (NIV) (which he never answered), “Now if there is no awakening of the dead, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the asleep are not aloft at all, why are humans baptized for them?” From these two changing questions accept risen the devilish doctrines of Mormon commissioned works performed in clandestineness in multi-million dollar Mormon temples.

During the 30 alive years (1970-2000) that I abominably spent in the Mormon Church, several Mormon accepted authorities declared in the Mormon accepted conferences that the chat of acumen is a “faith-keeping commandment” for altitude of a latter-day saint’s adherence to the LDS Church. Back in the day of the Mormon Prophet Brigham Young, from 1850 until 1877, the commodity of claret amends was aswell activated as a “faith-keeping commandment.” This pernicious commodity of devils activated to rank-and-file Mormons who were accused by the 19th Century Mormon bureaucracy of committing sins that were admired as “beyond the amends of Jesus Christ,” for which the address of Jesus’ adored claret did not apply. These accused Mormons were told to voluntarily abandonment themselves to committees of Mormon executioners to be collapsed to accept their claret breeze into the earth, so that they would accept the befalling to acquire Mormon acclaim (the accomplished amount of Mormon heaven area alone Mormons may reside), their acceptance being, thereby, tested. The Mormon Church, for abounding decades of time, aria about the convenance of claret amends during the 19th Century Utah Mormon theocracy afore the journals and affidavit of afflicted 19th Century Mormons were accessible to the accessible for actual perusal.

In summation, this commodity article is advised to annotate one accurate angry commodity affected by Mormonism’s Joseph Smith, the Mormon bloom cipher accepted as the chat of wisdom. All added Mormon doctrines absolute Mormon agnostic and agnostic canon are appropriately of the devil, and may be apparent for what they are by address to the angelic scriptures of God’s Angelic Word, the Angelic Bible.